PBW is going to get political for a minute. Please return your tray tables to the upright position.
Freedom of speech in America is always a serious issue, not just for those of us who depend on the First Amendment to protect us and our craft, but now the everyday average citizen who keeps an internet weblog.
To back track a little, censorship is basically about crowd control. Before the internet and the information age in which we live, politicians, the media and, by extension, religious leaders and big corporations decided what information was made available to Americans, and what was withheld. They pushed their own agendas and suppressed those which they opposed. They told us what to like, what to hate, and what to think. It's the traditional way leaders run a country and exercise power and influence over their populace.
Despite our laws separating church and state, a troubling amount of religious factions were/are involved in this censorship and media manipulation. Religious factions are the reason why the AIDs plague, for example, was not dealt with when it should have been, in the initial stages of the epidemic. No one wanted to talk about a disease that primarily affected gay men, because religious leaders labeled gay men as evil and the disease that was killing them as a punishment from God.
Ronald Regan, the much-loved U.S. President who received such a wonderful obituary when he finally dropped dead, wouldn't even say the word AIDs until April 2, 1987, when he issued this unconcerned statement: "How that information is used must be up to schools and parents, not government. But let's be honest with ourselves, AIDS information can not be what some call 'value neutral.' After all, when it comes to preventing AIDS, don't medicine and morality teach the same lessons."
Many people wept when Regan died. I wasn't one of them.
AIDs had already been identified six years before Regan spoke. One of his family friends, actor Rock Hudson, died of AIDs the year before the president made the little above mention. By the time our government acknowledged there even was a disease, nearly 100,000 people were infected with HIV. It spread beyond the gay community. People were infected through blood transfusions, IV needles and hetero sex. The God-punishment disease started killing housewives and Little Leaguers and newborn infants.
What was the price tag? The CDC has published online statistics in America only up to 2003, so these figures aren't even accurate:
"The cumulative estimated number of diagnoses of AIDS through 2003 in the United States is 929,985. Adult and adolescent AIDS cases total 920,566 with 749,887 cases in males and 170,679 cases in females. Through the same time period, 9,419 AIDS cases were estimated in children under age 13."
How many lives could we have saved if information about AIDs had not been suppressed by our own government? Here's the CDC death toll stats:
The cumulative estimated number of deaths of persons with AIDS through 2003 is 524,060, including 518,568 adults and adolescents, and 5,492 children under age 13.
The internet has taken access to information away from the media and the politicians, and made great progress in destroying censorship control. Anyone who followed the last Presidential election saw it happen in real time. Today anyone can be and is a source of information, opinion and debate on any subject. Having those resources accessible and available is why I consider myself to be living in the most enlightened time in American history.
That time will quickly come to an end if the internet is regulated. That could happen as early as next week.
Everyone should read Tech Central Station.com Editor Nick Schulz's interview with FEC Commissioner Brad Smith about regulation of political speech on the Internet. (Link nicked from ProfessorBainbridge.com.)
The FEC hearing is scheduled for June 28-29 in Washington D.C. To see what you can do to help fight the proposed FEC regulation, go over to the Center for Democracy and Technology's Protect Online Political Speech page. If you're still not sure why you should help fight this regulation, read this page.
Saturday, June 25, 2005
It's not just RWA
Posted by the author at 12:58 AM
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Thanks for making everyone aware of this.ReplyDelete
Did my bit.
This is getting scarier all the time, folks. I'm of a generation who still remembers how hard it was to GET some of these personal freedoms. We're losing them one by one.
The expression of independent political thought is a first amendment RIGHT. The FEC has no damn business interfering.
Freedom and USA are not what I'd consider complimentary terms anymore. I'm just stunned at the daily revoking of basic freedoms in small pieces that's occuring there.ReplyDelete
What the heck is going on down there? Does the government not have anything better to do but bully its own citizens now?
Thanks for posting this.ReplyDelete
Nico> Apparently not. *sigh*
Thanks from me, also. I'm just about at my limit of what I can stand from this repressive government, and I just can't see how Americans can stand idly by and watch our basic rights being taken away one by one. It's terrifying and the implications are so broad that every American who believes in the Constitution should be willing to go to the mat to stop this juggernaut.ReplyDelete
Fantastic post PBW. Some scary shit happening across the border (I'm in Canada).ReplyDelete
Thanks for the heads-up. I signed the principles and I intend to write my Representative, both Senators, and all the FEC Commissioners about this.ReplyDelete
The only way anybody will shut me up will be to duct-tape my mouth shut. You want to regulate what I say on my own blog? Bring it, brother, it's on!
I am going to set up my "Fuck Censorship" Webring sometime this weekend. Membership qualifications are the willingness to say what you want when you want and dare anybody to make you stop.
No political parties were helped or funded by this post. Fuck off, FEC.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.ReplyDelete
It's disturbing how many of America's freedoms are being slowly whittled away. Whether it's a 'security measure' or because some influential religious nut - sorry, morally concerned citizen - it's frightening that there is little explanation but for a 'we know what's good for you' speech. I think it's time Americans stood up for their beliefs and said 'no more'.ReplyDelete
Worse, I can see the undermining of your rights from here and I'm not even on the same continent! (Just because I live in the land down under, doesn't mean I'm looking up your kilt, either!)
I'm sure many other citizens who live in this global village are also worried about what's happening over there.
Gird your loins fellow villagers, because I doubt the fight will be fair or easy.
A timely warning, thanks PBW. We've similar insidious events happening here, with our government growing exponentially and getting its grubby little fingers into areas of life it really has no reason to touch.ReplyDelete
Latest in a long line of 'great ideas' from President Blair is a law banning incitement to religious hatred. Now at first glance this seems like a good idea - no more National Front attacking Jews, no more tirades against all muslims based on the actions of just a few - but it doesn't draw any distinction between religious hatred and religious ridicule (or indeed any kind of religious criticism at all). So saying publicly that you think Muslim fundamentalists are misguided in their thinking, or that some teachings of the Koran (or the bible for that matter) are wrong, will now be a criminal offence.
Thoughtful comments, PBW.ReplyDelete
Thanks for the info.
This is meant as a kindly fyi-- you have a typo..it's Reagan, for former president Ronald, and Regan for Don Regan, Reagan appointee.